I get your overall argument, but...

by Greg, seemingly ranch, Friday, February 03, 2012, 13:21 (5240 days ago) @ irishoutsider

Your examples are flawed.

Execution puts you on a fairly even playing field vs raw talent. Boise State, TCU, OSU, Stanford, Oregon in recent years are what I'm basing this on.

Kellen Moore, Andy Dalton, Brandon Weedon, and Andrew Luck are pretty much "superstar" QBs in terms of their collegiate abilities. Yes, each fit very well into the program he was asked to run, maybe so much so that the program made the QB as much as the QB made the program (except luck). Or maybe it was a synergy of talented QB and program tailored to that QB's talent. But in all cases except Oregon, it has yet to be shown that the team can keep up the same level of success in the years after the QB leaves. Yes, TCU beat Boise this year; they also had some bad losses. It will be interesting to watch each of these schools and to see what they do as they move on without their QB.


Complete thread:

 

powered by my little forum