In terms of being a one (OK, two)-hit wonder, yeah. But,

by BillyGoat @, At Thanksgiving with Joe Bethersontin, Friday, February 03, 2012, 11:25 (5241 days ago) @ HumanRobot

the big difference is that Stanford accomplished what they did with a cultural transformation of the program on both sides of the ball that did NOT exist in 2005 or 2006 at ND and which led to our downfall. Stanford is a tough, physical, sound team. They will likely experience some carryover as a result -- and much more than we carried over from 2006 to 2007 (though, of course, there were other issues, too). But if that 2007 team had Stanford's mentality from the last two years, they could have gone 6-6 or so.


Complete thread:

 

powered by my little forum