question on quarterback forecasting
It's been said that this isn't a great year for prep quarterbacks. Unfortunately, Charlie plans on signing two of them to fill out our depth.
My question is, do you think we can get away with not having a bona fide starter emerge from this class? Will we be able to bridge the gap by going straight from Crist to a 2011 recruit?
Back of the napkin: barring injury, Crist should start in 2011 and 2012 (or even a year earlier, if Clausen goes pro after this year), but be gone by 2013. So we need someone to take over in 2013. If we get 2 quarterbacks from this 'down' year, and neither pans out, we could still land someone in 2011 who could feasibly take over by 2013. That recruit will have had 2 years on the bench and come in as a junior, which I guess could work.
Edit: basically, though, we absolutely need to land a top flight guy this year or next.
Complete thread:
- For you recruiting junkies... -
BPH,
2009-03-11, 13:35
- Imagine an OL haul of Lombard, Henderson, and Hurst - Rob (Rakes of Mallow), 2009-03-11, 17:09
- question on quarterback forecasting -
Jay,
2009-03-11, 14:42
- QB is the one position that doesn't worry me -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-11, 18:25
- I don't have any data to back this up either, but - Pete, 2009-03-12, 06:57
- It worries me -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2009-03-11, 21:36
- I disagree about Weis' offenses -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-12, 11:02
- about the only guy that didn't get better under CW was Mirer -
Jay,
2009-03-12, 11:10
- And Mirer's numbers technically improved under Weis -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-12, 12:56
- Weis upgraded him from Triple Sell to Risky
-
Brian,
2009-03-14, 19:28
- Weis upgraded him from Triple Sell to Risky
- And Mirer's numbers technically improved under Weis -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-12, 12:56
- about the only guy that didn't get better under CW was Mirer -
Jay,
2009-03-12, 11:10
- Not asking for sources or anything... -
scriptcomesfirst,
2009-03-12, 06:27
- The concerns -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2009-03-12, 08:45
- I do know that they begin each QB portion of practice... -
scriptcomesfirst,
2009-03-12, 10:03
- I went to Powlus' session year before last -
Jay,
2009-03-12, 11:34
- Good points, Jay - scriptcomesfirst, 2009-03-12, 14:25
- I went to Powlus' session year before last -
Jay,
2009-03-12, 11:34
- I do know that they begin each QB portion of practice... -
scriptcomesfirst,
2009-03-12, 10:03
- The concerns -
Rob (Rakes of Mallow),
2009-03-12, 08:45
- I disagree about Weis' offenses -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-12, 11:02
- Mike hinted on IE today that we might take only one QB -
BPH,
2009-03-11, 15:55
- I haven't been following closely -
Spesh,
2009-03-11, 17:47
- Hinder is #76 overall -
Pat,
2009-03-11, 18:29
- "Crappy rock band"? - Brian, 2009-03-14, 19:30
- The recruiting grapevine... -
BPH,
2009-03-11, 18:19
- Obviously it's a very rough analogy, - Pete, 2009-03-12, 06:53
- the name is important? -
Spesh,
2009-03-11, 19:57
- It's a nice ancillary benefit -
BPH,
2009-03-11, 20:27
- Sounds like Marsh might jump on an offer. - Bingo, 2009-03-12, 06:19
- It's a nice ancillary benefit -
BPH,
2009-03-11, 20:27
- Hinder is #76 overall -
Pat,
2009-03-11, 18:29
- I haven't been following closely -
Spesh,
2009-03-11, 17:47
- QB is the one position that doesn't worry me -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-11, 18:25