It wasn't just the lack of playing time.
It was also the complete lack of practice reps for Sharpley. Weis was vocal that Quinn was getting them all.
That was bad planning, in my opinion.
Complete thread:
- bringing this discussion over here -
Jay,
2009-03-09, 22:47
- I'm not sure that it would have meant more wins. -
PMan,
2009-03-10, 07:57
- I actually think the plan was as you described -
Jay,
2009-03-10, 11:30
- Sharpley attempted only two passes in 2006 -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-10, 15:52
- honestly, I don't think Charlie was looking that far ahead - Jay, 2009-03-10, 19:55
- It wasn't just the lack of playing time. -
PMan,
2009-03-10, 17:53
- Weis' quote... -
domer.mq,
2009-03-10, 20:23
- Is this an actual quote? -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-10, 20:52
- To be clear... - domer.mq, 2009-03-10, 20:59
- Is this an actual quote? -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-10, 20:52
- Weis' quote... -
domer.mq,
2009-03-10, 20:23
- My beef with CW. - San Pedro, 2009-03-10, 14:33
- Sharpley attempted only two passes in 2006 -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-10, 15:52
- I actually think the plan was as you described -
Jay,
2009-03-10, 11:30
- It wouldn't have made a meaningful difference. - KGB, 2009-03-10, 07:21
- Two things. -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-03-10, 06:08
- Excellent point on #2 -
Pat (Moco),
2009-03-10, 06:29
- I agree - Jeff (BGS), 2009-03-10, 15:57
- Excellent point on #2 -
Pat (Moco),
2009-03-10, 06:29
- A Sharpley-led team, with a completely different outlook -
Kevin,
2009-03-10, 05:27
- "completely different outlook" is the key assumption - Jay, 2009-03-10, 11:24
- I certainly do not. - Pat (Moco), 2009-03-10, 05:26
- Maybe, -
DaveK,
2009-03-10, 05:15
- I think you hit the nail on the head. -
JRT,
2009-03-10, 07:50
- I do agree with you guys - Jay, 2009-03-10, 11:13
- I think you hit the nail on the head. -
JRT,
2009-03-10, 07:50
- I'm not sure that it would have meant more wins. -
PMan,
2009-03-10, 07:57