the Polo Grounds

Back to the forum index

Open in thread

"completely different outlook" is the key assumption

by Jay, San Diego, Tuesday, March 10, 2009, 11:24 (6350 days ago) @ Kevin

It would have taken a hell of a lot more than installing Sharpley to turn any of those wins into losses.

I think the Navy game was the only bona fide "shouda" on the season, and for that one the "play more Sharpley" argument is out the window anyway.

locked

437 views

Complete thread:

bringing this discussion over here - Jay, 2009-03-09, 22:47
- I'm not sure that it would have meant more wins. - PMan, 2009-03-10, 07:57
  - I actually think the plan was as you described - Jay, 2009-03-10, 11:30
    - Sharpley attempted only two passes in 2006 - Jeff (BGS), 2009-03-10, 15:52
      - honestly, I don't think Charlie was looking that far ahead - Jay, 2009-03-10, 19:55
      - It wasn't just the lack of playing time. - PMan, 2009-03-10, 17:53
        
        Weis' quote... - domer.mq, 2009-03-10, 20:23
        
        Is this an actual quote? - Jeff (BGS), 2009-03-10, 20:52
        
        To be clear... - domer.mq, 2009-03-10, 20:59
    - My beef with CW. - San Pedro, 2009-03-10, 14:33
- It wouldn't have made a meaningful difference. - KGB, 2009-03-10, 07:21
- Two things. - FunkDoctorSpock, 2009-03-10, 06:08
  - Excellent point on #2 - Pat (Moco), 2009-03-10, 06:29
    - I agree - Jeff (BGS), 2009-03-10, 15:57
- A Sharpley-led team, with a completely different outlook - Kevin, 2009-03-10, 05:27
  - "completely different outlook" is the key assumption - Jay, 2009-03-10, 11:24
- I certainly do not. - Pat (Moco), 2009-03-10, 05:26
- Maybe, - DaveK, 2009-03-10, 05:15
  - I think you hit the nail on the head. - JRT, 2009-03-10, 07:50
    - I do agree with you guys - Jay, 2009-03-10, 11:13

powered by my little forum