I certainly do not.
I single-handedly blame him for the Navy loss in 2007. You couldn't really see it from the television, but he had receivers open all day all over the field, and never even looked at half of them. I understand Weis made a lot of boneheaded playcalls that game, but his worst was not playing Clausen.
Complete thread:
- bringing this discussion over here -
Jay,
2009-03-09, 22:47
- I'm not sure that it would have meant more wins. -
PMan,
2009-03-10, 07:57
- I actually think the plan was as you described -
Jay,
2009-03-10, 11:30
- Sharpley attempted only two passes in 2006 -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-10, 15:52
- honestly, I don't think Charlie was looking that far ahead - Jay, 2009-03-10, 19:55
- It wasn't just the lack of playing time. -
PMan,
2009-03-10, 17:53
- Weis' quote... -
domer.mq,
2009-03-10, 20:23
- Is this an actual quote? -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-10, 20:52
- To be clear... - domer.mq, 2009-03-10, 20:59
- Is this an actual quote? -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-10, 20:52
- Weis' quote... -
domer.mq,
2009-03-10, 20:23
- My beef with CW. - San Pedro, 2009-03-10, 14:33
- Sharpley attempted only two passes in 2006 -
Jeff (BGS),
2009-03-10, 15:52
- I actually think the plan was as you described -
Jay,
2009-03-10, 11:30
- It wouldn't have made a meaningful difference. - KGB, 2009-03-10, 07:21
- Two things. -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-03-10, 06:08
- Excellent point on #2 -
Pat (Moco),
2009-03-10, 06:29
- I agree - Jeff (BGS), 2009-03-10, 15:57
- Excellent point on #2 -
Pat (Moco),
2009-03-10, 06:29
- A Sharpley-led team, with a completely different outlook -
Kevin,
2009-03-10, 05:27
- "completely different outlook" is the key assumption - Jay, 2009-03-10, 11:24
- I certainly do not. - Pat (Moco), 2009-03-10, 05:26
- Maybe, -
DaveK,
2009-03-10, 05:15
- I think you hit the nail on the head. -
JRT,
2009-03-10, 07:50
- I do agree with you guys - Jay, 2009-03-10, 11:13
- I think you hit the nail on the head. -
JRT,
2009-03-10, 07:50
- I'm not sure that it would have meant more wins. -
PMan,
2009-03-10, 07:57