Yeah, I think an open draft...
will better enable "market forces" and give us a better chance of highlighting some talent that readers may not know much about.
I'd love to do a fantasy game, but the work is just too much.
We'll do ST. P, K, and 1 return man. And we'll treat the return man as separate from the WR/RB pool, so if someone already got Golden Tate, WR, you can still get Golden Tate, Return Man if you wish.
Any thoughts on presentation of picks? Would people want to do one post per player, or just after the dust has settled from the draft, each site posts their picks? Or, might we want to do round-by-round where I take each drafter's write up of their pick in that draft, compile, and distribute back to the various participants?
--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.
Complete thread:
- ND Bloggers (and friends) Mock ND/Opposition Draft -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 05:32
- I'm in for sure.
-
Joe,
2009-06-01, 19:26
- base offense suggestion -
Spesh,
2009-05-28, 07:25
- I was thinking of this for both sides of the ball. -
PMan,
2009-05-28, 07:28
- Yeah, the flex position would probably work well for O and D -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 07:46
- I think we should definitely tackle special teams -
Spesh,
2009-05-28, 07:58
- Can you point me to... -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 10:21
- as a start -
Pat,
2009-05-28, 10:45
- Thanks. That's a big help.
-
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 14:30
- Thanks. That's a big help.
- as a start -
Pat,
2009-05-28, 10:45
- Yeah, I think an open draft... - domer.mq, 2009-05-28, 08:14
- Can you point me to... -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 10:21
- I think we should definitely tackle special teams -
Spesh,
2009-05-28, 07:58
- Yeah, the flex position would probably work well for O and D -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 07:46
- I was thinking of this for both sides of the ball. -
PMan,
2009-05-28, 07:28
- I'm in for sure.