base offense suggestion
I would suggest going with just a flex position-- teams can draft either a 2nd RB, a 3rd WR, or a 2nd TE.
I think of a team like USC with their 6 or 7 running backs, and I'm not sure how those guys would get drafted. On the other hand, a lot of teams (ND included) use 3 WRs more than 2 RBs.
Complete thread:
- ND Bloggers (and friends) Mock ND/Opposition Draft -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 05:32
- I'm in for sure.
-
Joe,
2009-06-01, 19:26
- base offense suggestion -
Spesh,
2009-05-28, 07:25
- I was thinking of this for both sides of the ball. -
PMan,
2009-05-28, 07:28
- Yeah, the flex position would probably work well for O and D -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 07:46
- I think we should definitely tackle special teams -
Spesh,
2009-05-28, 07:58
- Can you point me to... -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 10:21
- as a start -
Pat,
2009-05-28, 10:45
- Thanks. That's a big help.
-
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 14:30
- Thanks. That's a big help.
- as a start -
Pat,
2009-05-28, 10:45
- Yeah, I think an open draft... - domer.mq, 2009-05-28, 08:14
- Can you point me to... -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 10:21
- I think we should definitely tackle special teams -
Spesh,
2009-05-28, 07:58
- Yeah, the flex position would probably work well for O and D -
domer.mq,
2009-05-28, 07:46
- I was thinking of this for both sides of the ball. -
PMan,
2009-05-28, 07:28
- I'm in for sure.