I agree
Although I think this is further evidence of failure if we don't measure up this year, it doesn't give me any hope that we will measure up this year.
I almost posted the exact same thing but with the conclusion, we'll have the top 5 talent and top 5 experience and end up top 20 since we have a 2nd tier coach.
I thought that post was a bit too caustic though so I just focused on why I'm going to keep having low expectations for this year. Not because I think we have any excuses but because I think that's where we'll end up, no matter what all of the experience stats or recruiting rankings show. I never saw a future top 3 team on the field last year and certainly not at the Blue-Gold game. I'm going off what my eyes have seen moreso than what the paper says.
Complete thread:
- How much starting experience do top teams have? -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-13, 06:54
- For some reason this stuff never encourages me -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-13, 08:57
- If it were possible, would it make sense - Three D, 2009-05-15, 05:31
- I think of it like I think of recruiting rankings -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-13, 09:35
- I think it's most useful comparing teams against themselves -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-13, 12:17
- If we have the raw talent and experience level... -
BPH,
2009-05-13, 12:55
- I agree -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-14, 08:56
- Then we'll have a new coach this time next year.
-
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-14, 10:26
- For top 20? -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-14, 13:22
- Misread your post. - FunkDoctorSpock, 2009-05-14, 13:28
- For top 20? -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-14, 13:22
- Then we'll have a new coach this time next year.
- I agree -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-14, 08:56
- Well then, we should look at lot like the 2005-2006 teams.
-
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-13, 12:25
- If we have the raw talent and experience level... -
BPH,
2009-05-13, 12:55
- I think it's most useful comparing teams against themselves -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-13, 12:17
- For some reason this stuff never encourages me -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-13, 08:57