If we have the raw talent and experience level...
of a top-five team (which we really do based on recruiting rankings and returning starts), then I think it is useful to compare us to top-five teams (or at least top 10). That sets the bar for expected performance. Regardless of how we did last year, based on talent and experience we should be an elite team. Thus, if we aren't, then it's a coaching failure and Weis needs to be held accountable.
Complete thread:
- How much starting experience do top teams have? -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-13, 06:54
- For some reason this stuff never encourages me -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-13, 08:57
- If it were possible, would it make sense - Three D, 2009-05-15, 05:31
- I think of it like I think of recruiting rankings -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-13, 09:35
- I think it's most useful comparing teams against themselves -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-13, 12:17
- If we have the raw talent and experience level... -
BPH,
2009-05-13, 12:55
- I agree -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-14, 08:56
- Then we'll have a new coach this time next year.
-
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-14, 10:26
- For top 20? -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-14, 13:22
- Misread your post. - FunkDoctorSpock, 2009-05-14, 13:28
- For top 20? -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-14, 13:22
- Then we'll have a new coach this time next year.
- I agree -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-14, 08:56
- Well then, we should look at lot like the 2005-2006 teams.
-
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-13, 12:25
- If we have the raw talent and experience level... -
BPH,
2009-05-13, 12:55
- I think it's most useful comparing teams against themselves -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-13, 12:17
- For some reason this stuff never encourages me -
MadisonDomer,
2009-05-13, 08:57