was it Baer or his secondary and Sam LB?

by Spesh , Los Angeles, Sunday, February 05, 2012, 19:02 (5239 days ago) @ BillyGoat

We were atrocious in coverage. But what kind of DB talent did he have? In 2001 it was Ellick and Burrell. In 2002 it was Richardson; in 2003 it was Hedgemon, Zibby, Parrish, and Wooden. In 2004 it was Lambert and ?

I'm sure I forgot some guys, but that's not a lot to work with. Then throw in some slow Sam LBs (Curry), and I'm not sure how you're supposed to do anything.

Baer didn't help himself through recruiting, and he deserves blame for that, but I honestly don't think he's that horrible.

locked

98 views

Complete thread:

On building program toughness - Bill, 2012-02-04, 12:13
- Do those numbers hold up for pass-first spread teams? - Jeff (BGS), 2012-02-04, 13:19
- More: Alabama was +3.06 this year. Oregon was +3.01. - LaFortune Teller, 2012-02-04, 12:54
  - 2.50 was Holtz's best: in 1992 - Bill, 2012-02-04, 13:04
    - Those numbers were bolstered by the defense - CK08, 2012-02-05, 07:57
    - Those numbers are surprising - BPH, 2012-02-04, 13:13
      - My perception was that Baer's defense was - BillyGoat, 2012-02-05, 18:47
        
        was it Baer or his secondary and Sam LB? - Spesh, 2012-02-05, 19:02
        
        02 Secondary was very good - CK08, 2012-02-06, 09:26
- Great post - BPH, 2012-02-04, 12:42
  - Someone alluded to this the other day... - KGB, 2012-02-04, 12:49
    - or if those two had been back as seniors in 2010? - bpeters07, 2012-02-04, 12:53
      - I can't make up my mind if Clausen or Tate would - BillyGoat, 2012-02-05, 11:56

the Polo Grounds

was it Baer or his secondary and Sam LB?