2.50 was Holtz's best: in 1992
The team that Weis inherited was sub-standard, but not the complete mess that he left for Kelly.
2002: +0.60
2003: +0.86
2004: +0.67
Complete thread:
- On building program toughness -
Bill,
2012-02-04, 12:13
![[*]](themes/default/images/complete_thread.png "Open whole thread")
- Do those numbers hold up for pass-first spread teams? - Jeff (BGS), 2012-02-04, 13:19
- More: Alabama was +3.06 this year. Oregon was +3.01.
![[ [ No text ] ]](themes/default/images/no_text.png "Empty posting / no text")
-
LaFortune Teller,
2012-02-04, 12:54
- 2.50 was Holtz's best: in 1992 -
Bill,
2012-02-04, 13:04
- Those numbers were bolstered by the defense - CK08, 2012-02-05, 07:57
- Those numbers are surprising -
BPH,
2012-02-04, 13:13
- My perception was that Baer's defense was -
BillyGoat,
2012-02-05, 18:47
- was it Baer or his secondary and Sam LB? -
Spesh,
2012-02-05, 19:02
- 02 Secondary was very good - CK08, 2012-02-06, 09:26
- was it Baer or his secondary and Sam LB? -
Spesh,
2012-02-05, 19:02
- My perception was that Baer's defense was -
BillyGoat,
2012-02-05, 18:47
- 2.50 was Holtz's best: in 1992 -
Bill,
2012-02-04, 13:04
- Great post -
BPH,
2012-02-04, 12:42
- Someone alluded to this the other day... -
KGB,
2012-02-04, 12:49
- or if those two had been back as seniors in 2010? -
bpeters07,
2012-02-04, 12:53
- I can't make up my mind if Clausen or Tate would - BillyGoat, 2012-02-05, 11:56
- or if those two had been back as seniors in 2010? -
bpeters07,
2012-02-04, 12:53
- Someone alluded to this the other day... -
KGB,
2012-02-04, 12:49