This was bursting to come out with all the soccer talk, huh?
I speak both, so ...
Let's simplify and say that if Craig is healthy and Knapp is truly a "people mover" at guard, then even basic inside concepts should work well in short yardage. Add to that Lambert and a healthy Flanagan next to one another and off tackle/outside are in play, so there's enough variability to keep defenses off balance even when playing for run. RG will be a bit if a question mark but as long as it isn't a weakness, we should be good.
If we decide to throw against a loaded box then a healthy Faison will almost always be open. He's too quick to cover 1 on 1. Graham is an x factor here if he lives up to Spring hype, so that 2 guys that are uncoverable. Anything else is overthinking it, IMO.
On your 3) I think our defense will be dominant if healthy. We can't lose a safety and need KVA at 85%+. As you know, he is a massive variable and paired with Moore and Tae, it's too much for an offense to avoid all 3. The new DTs/SDE just need to be solid against the run and, as you note, in short yardage, where we were horrible last year.
Complete thread:
- Pre-Pre-Season Musings -
Mike (bart),
2026-07-08, 06:36
- The fix for #1 - KGB, 2026-07-08, 17:11
- I hope that Faison playing spring football - omahadomer, 2026-07-08, 15:54
- This was bursting to come out with all the soccer talk, huh? -
cdawg,
2026-07-08, 15:29
- TE blocking is another factor. -
KGB,
2026-07-08, 17:26
- That's a really good point - Mike (bart), 2026-07-08, 17:53
- Do we have any outside runs aside from the odd toss? - Mike (bart), 2026-07-08, 17:15
- TE blocking is another factor. -
KGB,
2026-07-08, 17:26
- On #1 -
Domer99,
2026-07-08, 11:15
- HR kinda mailed it below -
Mike (bart),
2026-07-08, 11:41
- But that still doesn't register with me -
Domer99,
2026-07-08, 15:17
- here's how I see it - HumanRobot, 2026-07-09, 07:18
- HR is always mailing it (in)
-
Jay,
2026-07-08, 11:49
- But that still doesn't register with me -
Domer99,
2026-07-08, 15:17
- HR kinda mailed it below -
Mike (bart),
2026-07-08, 11:41
- on #1 -
HumanRobot,
2026-07-08, 07:09
- I think Denbrock and Rudolph have joint responsibility here - San Pedro, 2026-07-08, 16:14
- Denbrock was also slow to give up on the wildcat -
Jeff (BGS),
2026-07-08, 09:15
- I was always fine with it but we seemed to have 1 play. -
Chris,
2026-07-08, 09:20
- They should have kept it - Mike (bart), 2026-07-08, 09:53
- I was always fine with it but we seemed to have 1 play. -
Chris,
2026-07-08, 09:20
- 100%. Terrible overreaction by Denbrock -
Mike (bart),
2026-07-08, 07:53
- I'm not a huge fan of 2RB -
HumanRobot,
2026-07-08, 11:01
- As a context specific package -
Mike (bart),
2026-07-08, 12:03
- more heresy -
HumanRobot,
2026-07-08, 12:55
- Agreed. It's definitely a Denbrock weak spot - Mike (bart), 2026-07-08, 13:06
- more heresy -
HumanRobot,
2026-07-08, 12:55
- wash your mouth out - Jay, 2026-07-08, 11:51
- As a context specific package -
Mike (bart),
2026-07-08, 12:03
- I'm not a huge fan of 2RB -
HumanRobot,
2026-07-08, 11:01