I think there are distinctions here for rev share & NIL

by GloveND, Tuesday, May 05, 2026, 10:12 (22 days ago) @ omahadomer

NIL has been what has mostly governed for the last few years with Rev Share (I think) only starting last season. NIL Contracts are generally tied to some bogus reason like signing autographs or promoting some collective. As they were not specifically for playing football, the non-compete had some enforcement issues as the contract itself is not for playing football.

I think the Rev Share contracts now being signed specifically by the schools are for playing college football and likely more enforceable on non-compete. Mensah settled his dispute. Sorsby is in litigation and Desmond Williams elected to stay at Washington because of his contract and worries of a lawsuit.

locked

144 views

Complete thread:

NIL non-compete question -- - omahadomer, 2026-05-04, 17:15
- I think there are distinctions here for rev share & NIL - GloveND, 2026-05-05, 10:12
  - Yes, but I think that for the more prominent players (and - BillyGoat, 2026-05-05, 10:17
- Georgia was suing a Mizzou defensive player - Silk, 2026-05-05, 09:05
  - He's now at Miami - BPH, 2026-05-05, 11:49
  - Drinkowitz is a sh!tbag. - Chris, 2026-05-05, 09:08
- I'd love to get a better understanding of how that works... - BillyGoat, 2026-05-05, 08:46
  - Aren’t there also jurisdiction issues? - terribletr, 2026-05-05, 09:32
    - I think Georgia could sue in Georgia state court or federal - San Pedro, 2026-05-05, 09:51
      - Interestingly, FTC recently tried a national ban but failed. - Grantland, 2026-05-05, 12:38
      - Yes, I'm sure they do. I was more thinking of how the - BillyGoat, 2026-05-05, 09:53
    - Undoubtedly that will add to the shitshow. - BillyGoat, 2026-05-05, 09:49
- Not technically a non-compete but Darian Mensah - Domer99, 2026-05-04, 18:27
- Cincinnati did it - beattherush, 2026-05-04, 18:03

the Polo Grounds

I think there are distinctions here for rev share & NIL