In 2009...

by FunkDoctorSpock, Your Nightmares, B* tches, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 05:50 (6252 days ago)
edited by FunkDoctorSpock, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 06:00

ND is projected to:

-Have one of the most experienced (over 300 cumulative starts)teams in the country.

-Have one of the most experienced OL (100 career starts, up from 60 last year and 46 the year before) in the country.

-Have a third year starter at QB.

-Have 18 of 24 starters back and roughly 75% of the two deep. This is also mitigated by the fact that we get back two former starters that have 25 career starts between them.

-Return our leading passer, rusher, receiver, scorer, tackler, pass rusher, and pass defender.

-Add 13 players from the #1 recruiting class in the country that redshirted.

-Add 18 players from the fourth straight class to finish ranked in the Top 25 as well as the fourth straight to be among the nations best in average star rating.

-Have an experienced, accomplished play caller on offense.

-Have an experienced, accomplished play caller on defense.

-Have a schedule that has us facing 5 teams out of the first seven who will be breaking in a new starter at QB.

Also, ND will be coming off a season ending victory, something that has now happened 8 times since 1981. ND has played in a bowl game in each of the following seasons and won at least 10 games four out of seven times. On average, we've won 9 games in seasons where we won the last game of the previous season.


So yeah, you're goddamn right I have high expectations. It's time.

Ice Water

by MadisonDomer, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 10:04 (6252 days ago) @ FunkDoctorSpock

If only the athletes themselves determined football games...

And in 2010...

by BPH, San Diego, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 09:17 (6252 days ago) @ FunkDoctorSpock

almost all of the key players will be back, while we add what very well could be a top-3 recruiting class. Weis could realistically go from deserving to be fired to playing in a BCS title game in two years. I wonder if there's any historical precedent for that.

The closest I can think of (and it's not that close)

by Sherman Oaks, California, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 11:01 (6252 days ago) @ BPH
edited by Sherman Oaks, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 11:11

was Mack Brown at Texas. His record after 6 years was 59-18 (.766), which is excellent until you consider (1) Texas has ND-sized expectations and (2) those first 6 years included 0 BCS appearances and 4 straight losses to OU, including 63-14 and 65-13 annihilations. If Weis had that kind of record and two losses of that magnitude to Southern Cal (or anyone else), there would be at least isolated calls for his head on a platter. But Brown's 7th Texas team beat everyone except OU to finish 11-1, and his 8th team won the NC.

Bobby Ross went 2-9 and 3-8 in his first two years at Georgia Tech (1987-1988). I don't know how close he was to getting fired that early in his tenure, but in any event GT rebounded to 7-4 in year 3 and 11-0-1 and a split NC in year 4.

Before that, you probably have to go all the way back to Woody Hayes in the 1960s. Ohio State was 4-5 in 1966 and started 2-3 in 1967, including a 41-6 home loss to Purdue (which had beaten ND two weeks earlier and USC in the previous Rose Bowl). Hayes' job was in real jeopardy then, despite all he'd accomplished to that point; critics claimed that the game had passed him by and noted that OSU hadn't won a Big Ten title since 1961. Then OSU embarked on a 22-game winning streak, capturing the 1968 NC and staying at No. 1 until the 1969 finale when they lost to Bo Schembechler's first Michigan team. OSU rebounded to run the table in 1970 until starting their habit of losing Rose Bowls, this time in a shocking upset to Stanford. In total, OSU went on a 31-1 run after Hayes was on the verge of getting fired.

Of course, Hayes had 15 years of success at OSU before he got in deep trouble. Weis had a very good season in 2005 and a good but deflating one in 2006, and that's it.

Damn, Funky

by scriptcomesfirst @, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 09:12 (6252 days ago) @ FunkDoctorSpock

In sum, I'd say we're primed to kick some tail. This could be an enjoyable year, and damn it, I'm due for one of those (sports-wise). Does this mean the Cubs will win the Series?

2009 marks the 80-year anniversary

by Sherman Oaks, California, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 10:44 (6252 days ago) @ scriptcomesfirst

of the only time the Cubs won the NL pennant and ND won the football national championship in the same year. Given that the Great Depression also started that year, it looks like all the conditions are present for a repeat.

Can we give 13 of the Cubs wins this year to the Irish?

by MadisonDomer, Tuesday, February 17, 2009, 10:03 (6252 days ago) @ scriptcomesfirst

Will the Cubs have 13 wins this year to give?

powered by my little forum