I don't think that would work with our current UM agreement.
But I like your line of thinking. Don't we have UM strapped down for 20 years or something absurd?
At any rate, I'd really rather we only play 2 B11 teams a year, but since UM seems to be on the docket forever, I'd be game for UM + 2 others each year, so long as no consecutive years include playing the same B11 teams each year.
Above all else, I'd really like to see fewer games with PU. I see no point in the games. It feels contrived to try to call it some sort of intrastate rivalry.
--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.
Complete thread:
- Thoughts on ND-Wisconsin? -
MattyCinNYC,
2009-05-27, 18:22
- Re: -
Gator77,
2009-05-28, 05:11
- I agree regarding the relationship with that conference. - KGB, 2009-05-28, 07:14
- I don't think that would work with our current UM agreement. - domer.mq, 2009-05-28, 05:22
- I like it. - PMan, 2009-05-27, 18:35
- Re: -
Gator77,
2009-05-28, 05:11