That looks realistic, yet....
I would have a hard time digesting that type of loss to SC, yet again. Also, I think the Nevada game needs to be better defensively. I see us scoring 27-31pts, but if we give up 24 I am gonna be disappointed. I think UM, Pitt, and UConn could be a bigger spread. I just don't see Stanford scoring all that much if we are coming in 10-1 with a frosh QB at the helm who will likely be knee-deep in "battered wife syndrome" coming out of P10 play.
In the end you put together a likely best-case scenario...short of an SC win. Interesting food for thought.
NEVADA .... W 27-13
@ Michigan .... W 28-17
MICHIGAN STATE ... W 24-20
@ Purdue .... W 31-21
WASHINGTON .... W 34-10
SOUTHERN CAL .... L 16-24
B. COLLEGE .... W 24-23
WASHINGTON STATE .... W 49-0
NAVY .... W 31-14
@ Pittsburgh .... W 31-20
CONNECTICUT .... W 28-17
@ Stanford .... W 27-17
Complete thread:
- A numbers game? -
Pete,
2009-05-04, 10:34
- I said this elsewhere (maybe to you Pete) -
Jay,
2009-05-06, 12:20
- I think I'm getting quite used to the - Pete, 2009-05-06, 14:30
- Here's an example of an 11-1 season -
Sherman Oaks,
2009-05-05, 08:13
- That looks realistic, yet.... - River, 2009-05-05, 08:34
- I'm with you... -
domer.mq,
2009-05-04, 11:17
- He needs to win 85 - scriptcomesfirst, 2009-05-04, 16:36
- I said this elsewhere (maybe to you Pete) -
Jay,
2009-05-06, 12:20