That still makes our "best chance in years" vs. SoCal...
seem awfully, awfully tough.
I always think about depth in football because from Pee Wee on up through HS, I always remember hating having to play against the teams that could just keep throwing new players in there while your sorry butt couldn't complete a 40 in under 6 seconds. That number is going to pay big against us in the mid-3rd Q on thru the end of the game.
No excuses for not being competitive, but I hate that our "best chance in years" still looks on paper like it'll take a fair share of luck too.
--
Sometimes I rhyme slow sometimes I rhyme quick.
Complete thread:
- The Ten Most "Talented" Teams in the Country -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-04-29, 08:01
- Put another way... -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-04-29, 14:03
- That still makes our "best chance in years" vs. SoCal... -
domer.mq,
2009-04-30, 09:49
- It can be a little dispiriting... -
BPH,
2009-04-30, 14:06
- Yeah. And that 2005 team was the best matchup... -
domer.mq,
2009-04-30, 17:20
- I don't know about that. -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-01, 05:15
- I'd agree with this. - Bingo, 2009-05-02, 15:29
- I don't know about that. -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-05-01, 05:15
- Yeah. And that 2005 team was the best matchup... -
domer.mq,
2009-04-30, 17:20
- It can be a little dispiriting... -
BPH,
2009-04-30, 14:06
- That still makes our "best chance in years" vs. SoCal... -
domer.mq,
2009-04-30, 09:49
- Has your last line replaced the banner in the Gug?
-
Chris,
2009-04-29, 08:26
- Put another way... -
FunkDoctorSpock,
2009-04-29, 14:03